Transcript 07 December 2008 DoDAF Delivering Architectures to the World Presentation to

UNCLASSIFIED
DoDAF Delivering Architectures to the World
Presentation to
GTRA Architecture GOV Symposium
07 December 2008
Walt Okon
Senior Architect Engineer for Standards
Architecture and Interoperability Directorate
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Information Management, Integration, and Technology & DoD
Deputy Chief Information Officer
(703) 607- 0502
[email protected]
.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Strategy and Direction
Discussions:










DoDAF Version 2.0
Architecture Training - Architects Competencies
DoDAF Metamodel
“Fit for Purpose” Architecture
Defense-Industry Challenge – DoDAF + MODAF = UPDM
DoD IT Standards Registry (DISR)
IC & DoD IT Standards Integration
DoD GIG Technical Guidance (GTG)
Architects Career Path, Competencies & Certifications
DoD Information Sharing Environment
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Key Policies Requiring DoDAF
Joint Staff
 CJCSI 3170.01F, 1 MAY 2007, “JOINT CAPABILITIES
INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM”
 CJCSM 3170.01C, 1 MAY 2007, “OPERATION OF THE JOINT
CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT
SYSTEM”
 CJCSI 6212.01D, 8 MAR 2006, “INTEROPERABILITY AND
SUPPORTABILITY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND
NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEMS”
Direct support for the Warfighter
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoDAF Evolution To Support “Fit For Purpose”
Architecture
DoDAF 1.0
• CADM Separate
• Baseline For DoDAF 1.5
• Removed Essential & Supporting Designations
• Expanded audience to all of DoD
(Published in 2003)
UNCLASSIFIED
DoDAF 1.5
• Addresses Net-Centricity
• Volume III is CADM &
Architecture Data Strategy
• Addresses Architecture Federation
• Baseline for DoDAF 2.0
• Shifted away from DoDAF mandating
a set of products
DoDAF 2.0
• Cover Enterprise and
(Published in 2007)
Program Architecture
•
Emphasize
Data versus
DoDAF
Products
• Tailored Presentation
• AV-1 to capture federation
metadata
2.0
• Quality Support to Decision
Processes
• FEA & Allied/Coalition
Support
•
Journal
(To Be Published)
- Errata & Interim Releases
(Late 2008)
UNCLASSIFIED
Focused on DoD Decisions
Architecture
Views
Federated
Architectures
DoD Core
Decision Processes
PPBE/PfM
Cost View
Capability View
SE View
Acquisition
etc.
E
JCIDS
M
“Fit for Purpose”
DOTLMPF
C
E – Enterprise
M – Mission Area
C – DoD Component
P - Program
P
Acquisition
Systems Eng
Governance
Architecture
IT
Technology
Link Technology to Objectives
Institutionalize IT Best Practices
Protect digital assets
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Dashboards
Reference
Models
Graphical
Depictions
Fusion
Products
Composite
Products
Fit For
Purpose
Presentation
DoDAF V2.0 DoDAF V1.5
All “Systems”
Versions of
SV Products
Systems
All AVs
All
View
View
Net-Centric
All “Service”
Versions of
SV Products
All TVs
Standards
View
View
SV-11
OV-7
Rest of OVs
Data &
Information
Operational
View
View
System
Engineering
View
Updated
UNCLASSIFIED
Moved
New
Capability
Project
View
View
DoDAF Metamodel (DM2)
UNCLASSIFIED
DoDAF 2.0 Viewpoints
Project Viewpoint
Services Viewpoint
Articulate the performers, activities, services, and their
exchanges providing for, or supporting, DoD functions
Systems Viewpoint
Articulate the legacy systems or independent systems,
their composition, interconnectivity, and context
7
providing for, or supporting, DoD functions
Describes the relationships between operational and capability
requirements and the various projects being implemented; Details
dependencies between capability management and the Defense
Acquisition System process.
Articulate operational scenarios, processes, activities &
requirements
Standards Viewpoint
Operational Viewpoint
All Viewpoint
Articulate the data relationships and alignment structures in the
architecture content
Data and Information Viewpoint
Articulate applicable Operational, Business, Technical, and Industry
policy, standards, guidance, constraints, and forecasts
Articulate the capability requirement, delivery timing,
and deployed capability
Overarching aspects of architecture context that relate to all views
UNCLASSIFIED
Capability Viewpoint
UNCLASSIFIED
Vision Statement
To enable the development of
architectures that are meaningful,
useful, and relevant to the DoD
Requirements, Planning,
Budgeting, Systems Engineering,
and Acquisition decision
processes.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoDAF Metamodel
class Class Model
Proj ects
class Proj ect
Capabilities
Type
Goal
class Serv ices
0..*
Temporal Type
lead-to
Temporal Type
Effect
Condition
0..*
1..*
1..*
1..*
0..*
isrealizedby
Rule
Means
Type
Cost
Type
Proj ect
Capability
directs
InterfaceType
Temporal Type
CapabilityConfiguration
Activ ity
Plan
0..*
0..*
i s-a-part-of
i s-a-part-of
Organization
0..*
0..*
0..*
Temporal Type
PerformerState
0..*
Performer
0..*
PersonnelType
Organization
System
Activ ity
0..*
ExchangeObject
TemporalType
0..*
Performer
PersonnelType
is-a-partof
Skill
ExchangeObject
Materiel
TemporalType
RealProperty
0..*
InterfaceType
TemporalType
applies-to
ExchangeObject
Performer
i s-a-part-of
Skill
Standard
is-performed-by
performs
1..*
results-in
Temporal Type
RealProperty
i s-a-part-of
Rule
Serv iceRequirement
Serv iceImplementation
InterfaceType
TemporalType
Effect
Measure
i s-a-part-of
i s-a-part-of
Performer
Measure
0..*
appliesto
0..*
0..*
TemporalType
Type
Activ ity
0..*
results-in
0..*
Temporal Type
TemporalType
Condition
Type
1..*
changes
real i zes
0..*
TemporalType
Effect
0..*
PerformerState
TemporalType
Measure
0..*
lead-to
1..*
TemporalType
appl i es-to
0..*
0..*
seeksChangeT o
i s-performed-under
i s-part-of
resul ts-i n
Serv ices
TemporalType
is-realized-by
Vision
class Capability
is-necessary-for
System
initiates
initiatesstimulates
follow
satisfy
Softw areServ ice
Materiel
1..*
TemporalType
Condition
Ev ent
meet
comply-with
Measures
result-in
ExchangeObject
Rules
class Measure - WIP
class Rule
Type
Baseline::Measure
result-in
TemporalType
Condition
1..*
is-valid-under
NeedsSatisfactionMeasure
OrganizationalMeasure
0..*
Type
PerformanceMeasure
Rule
AdaptabilityMeasure
Cost
MaintainabilityMeasure
AccuracyPrecision
Dependability
Interoperability
Agreement
Means
Timeliness
Standard
Guidance
RateThroughput
Trustw orthiness
Constraint
Capacity
Reliability
UCORE IC-ISM-v 2::
SecurityAttributesGroup
FunctionalStandard
TechnicalStandard
Security
meet
according-to
to-meet
Performers
Obj ect Exchanges
class Performer
AbstractFeature
Type
GeoFeature
according-to
class ExhangeObj ectFlow
TemporalType
PerformerState
InterfaceType
TemporalType
Location
is at
Activ ity
1..*
Performer
2..*
0..*
is-performed-by
is-partof
System
accordingto
conduct
performs
performs
0..*
is-produced-by
0..*
0..*
0..*
TemporalType
ExchangeObj ect
Performer
InterfaceType
TemporalType
Standard
Netw ork
is-performed-by
PerformerState
1..*
Rule
TemporalType
0..*
is-consumed-by
Activ ity
accordingto
Organization
Softw areServ ice
ExchangeObject
PersonnelType
Skill
Rule
Materiel
UNCLASSIFIED
Materiel
PersonnelType
TemporalType
is-a-partof
ExchangeObject
Standard
Foundation
is-a-part-of
Data
Information
UNCLASSIFIED
DoDAF Conceptual Model
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
“Fit for Purpose” Architecture Descriptions
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Notional DoDAF v2.0 Development
Schedule (cont)
2nd
QTR 08
Feb
EA
Summit
23 Jan 08
PfM WS
PPBE WS
Feb 08
3rd
QTR 08
Mar
Apr
May
4th
QTR 08
Jun
Jul
Aug
Oct
EA Conf
14-19 Apr
Nov
DoD CIO
Approval
Plenary
22 July
Vwendor
Tool
Session
Plenary
1 Apr
SPIRAL II
4 Apr 08
Develop
Writing
Technical
Editing
SPIRAL III
27 Jun 08
Post
to
DARS
Cood
Validation
SPIRAL IV
12 Sep 08
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
UNCLASSIFIED
Sep
UNCLASSIFIED
DODAF Version 2.0 in Coordination
 Core Management Group - 10 December 2008
 Discuss DoDAF Version 2 Spiral 4 Draft.
– Comment and adjudication
 Next Step: OSD NII Informal coordination
– Comment and adjudication
 EA Summit – Services, Agencies, and COCOMs
 DoD Executive Coordination Committee
UNCLASSIFIED
Metadata Registration
Service
UNCLASSIFIED
DARS
Federated Catalog
DARS
Federation Web
Services
Federation Client
Services Menu
Register Provider
View Provider
SOAP
AV-1 metadata
captured and
extracted
by repository/tool
environment
UNCLASSIFIED
Update Provider
DDMS +
Metadata
(XML)
Register Metadata
Search Holdings
Repository/Tool
Environment
Federation
Repository
Federation
Client
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD Enterprise
Architecture
Tools
Ref Models
Tech Stds
Arch Guidance
Laws, Regs, and Policy
DITPR
DoD EA RM
DISR
DODAF
Laws Regs Policy
Force Application
TAMD
Building Partnerships
IA Architecture
Command & Control
JC2
Net-centric
COMMS & Transport
Battlespace Awareness
Protection
JDDA
MS&SM
RP&ILM
HRM
WSLM
FM
Dept of Army
Army
Architecture
HRM Architecture
Force Support
Corporate Management & Support
Dept of Navy
DON
Architecture
Dept of Air Force
Air Force
Architecture
Solution Architectures
UNCLASSIFIED
Logistics
DIA
NGA
NRO
NSA
DLA
DISA
Other
BEA
IEA
GLOBAL C2
Joint Capability Areas
DoD Architecture Federation
UNCLASSIFIED
es
er
stem
s/S
View
Sy
rds
da
Stan
vic
l
nica
Tech
Vie
w
Defense-Industry Challenge:
Synchronization of DoDAF-UPDM Lifecycles
Operational View
All View
Core Architecture Data Model
1. Governments
Produce Baselines
Develop, Evolve &
Harmonize
Defense Enterprise
Architecture
Frameworks
For Acquisition
RFC
Leverages Vendors StandardsBased Tools & Government Frameworks
3. Vendors
Produce Product
Versions
Defense Domain Tools
“Just-In-Time”
UNCLASSIFIED
2. Industry
Produces
Develops
Generic
Modeling &
Engineering
Standards
UNCLASSIFIED
UPDM – Unified Profile
for DoDAF/MODAF
Adaptive
Artisan Software
ASMG
BAE Systems
DoD
embeddedPlus
Generic
UNCLASSIFIED
Lockheed Martin Co
Mitre
MOD
No Magic
Raytheon
Rolls Royce
Sparx Systems
VisumPoint
UPDM RFC Group
UNCLASSIFIED
UPDM in General
UPDM is an OMG initiative to develop a modeling standard that
supports both the USA Department of Defense Architecture
Framework (DoDAF) and the UK Ministry of Defence Architecture
Framework (MODAF)
The UPDM Group was setup to:





Significantly enhance the quality,
productivity, and effectiveness of
DNDAF
architecture modeling
Promote architecture model reuse and
UPDM
maintainability
Improve tool interoperability and
communications between stakeholders
NAF
Reduce training impacts due to different tool
DoDAF 1.5
implementations and semantics
MODAF 1.2
Improve the integration between system of
systems modeling and system modeling to
support post acquisition life cycle design
modeling
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Need for UPDM
 Motivation
– Significantly enhance the quality, productivity, and
effectiveness associated with enterprise and system of
systems architecture modeling, promote architecture
model reuse and maintainability, improve tool
interoperability and communications between
stakeholders, and reduce training impacts due to
different tool implementations and semantics.
– Improve the integration between system of systems
modeling and system modeling to support post
acquisition life cycle design modeling.
 UPDM fully supported by DoD, MOD, IDEAS
– Statement and slides available on OMG website
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Federated Architectures
The Connection
UNCLASSIFIED
What the Operator Sees Today
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
What the Operator Expects to See
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
A Federation of Data Producers
Federation
Strategy
Reporting (OMB, GAO, etc)
DoD EA
Reference Models
DARS
MILDEP
AGENCY
REQTS.
UNCLASSIFIED
COCOM
DATA
•COI = Community of Interest
•CADM = Core Architecture Data Model
•DoDAF = DoD Architecture Framework
•NCOW RM – Net-Centric Operations &
Warfare Reference Model
• UPDM = UML Profile DoDAF & MODAF
•CADM
•DoDAF
•NCOW RM
DoD Decision Processes
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD EA Federation Strategy
Available on DARS Website: https://dars1.army.mil/IER/index.jsp
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD EA Federation Pilot Use

BTA/USTRANSCOM/Marine Corps:
– Federate the BEA with JDDA and Marine Corps Logistic
architectures and register in DARS to gain visibility into “end to
end” logistics process

Army:
– Create a “knowledge base” through architecture federation for
Army communities.
– Test tools and concepts through federation, i.e. social networking
(ontology development, semantic indexing,) architecture data
analysis, UPDM applicability

Air Force:
– Establish interface and search capability between DARS and
AFARS. Demonstrate search capability

Navy:
– Implement and use procedures outlined in the GIG Enterprise
Architecture Federation Strategy and DARS CONOPS to create a
repeatable federation process

Joint Staff/J6I:
– Identify interface points and alignment between Mission Area-level
architectures to obtain enable a horizontal view across mission
areas and drill down to Program level.

DARS:
– Develop registration template for AV-1 and DDMS metadata
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD IT Standards Registry
(DISR)
IC/DoD IT Standards
Registry
UNCLASSIFIED
26
UNCLASSIFIED
IT and NSS Interoperability and Supportability
Policy and Process Overview
DoD Sponsored Policy
DoDI
DoDI
4630.8
4630.8
JCPAT
JCPAT
JCPAT
CJCSI
CJCSM
3170.01C
3170.01
DoDD
5000.1
• JCIDS Documents
(ICD, CDD, CPD) ACAT I - III &
Special Interest
• Maintain OASD(NII) JCIDS/ISP
Assessment Capability
(JCPAT-E Tool)
• Maintain IT Standards and Profiles
(DISRonline)
• J6 Interoperability Requirements
Certification of All JCIDS Docs
(JCPAT-E Tool)
CJCSI
• Certify Standards Conformance
6212.01D
• ITS and NSS Interoperability
Requirements Certification
• ITS & NSS Predecessor Doc.
System Profile Requirement
- IT Standards Profile (DISRonline)
- IIC Profile (LISI)
• Assessments of NR-KPP in JCIDS
Docs
Joint Staff J-6
OASD(NII)
Joint Staff J-6 Interoperability Requirements
Certification Process
JCPAT
JCPAT
J6I
ITS & NSS
Stage I, II & III
Interoperability Requirements
Registration
Assessments
Certification
DISR Online
JCPAT
J6
JCPAT-E
LISI InspeQtor
=
• UAM / JCPAT- E System Registration
• Technical View (CDD & CPD)
• Interoperability & Interconnectivity
Profile (CDD & CPD)
UNCLASSIFIED
KM/DS
Joint Staff
J-8
JROC
FCB
UNCLASSIFIED
DISR and DISRonline Architecture View
Governance
and General
Information Area
Voting Tool Software
Collaboration Tool
Software
Change Request Tool Software
Profile Assistance Software
Policy
FAQs
DISR Profile Registry Area
CM Procedures
User Guides
Links
SOP
Future
Enhancements
GIG Mission Area Management
PM System IT
Standards
Profiles
TVs *
Prescribed
Technology
Profiles *
(IPv6, PKI etc.)
Key
Interface
Profiles *
(KIPs)
POCs
DISR Mandated Standards
Mandated “Net-Centric” & Mandated Sunset “Interoperability”
Standards
DoD IT Standards Registry (DISRonline)
Lifecycle Tagged: Emerging and Retired Standards
* May Contain Standards from Lifecycle Categories other than Mandated
UNCLASSIFIED
Organization-Unique
Bins
- - - - - - - - - Information /
Guidance (I/G)
Informational Standards
Best Practices
Procedures
Policies
Manuals
Handbooks
Other IT Documents
 Objectives:
 Champion DoD’s
Re-Engagement of the IT
Standards Communities
 Online IT standards
Registry
 Tri-Annual Update of IT
Standards Registry
 Tied to JCIDS IT
Standards Conformance
and Compliance Process
 Intelligence Community
Cross Coordination
(ICSR)
 Improved DoD Visibility
and Participation in IT
Standards Development
Organizations
 Develop and Register PM
Standards Profiles (TV)
 Standing IT Standards
Working Groups Aligned
to GIG Portfolio
Management
UNCLASSIFIED



Lifecycle of a Standard
Emerging
– Upgradeability Should be a Concern
– May be Implemented but Not in Lieu of Mandated Standard
– Expected to be Mandated within Three Years
Mandated
– Essential for Interoperability and Net-Centric Services in DoD
– Minimum Set of Essential Standards for the Acquisition of All
DoD Systems that Produce, Use, or Exchange Info, and, When
Implemented, Facilitates the Flow of Info in Support of
Warfighter
– Sunset Tag Identifies an Event and Date to Retire a Standard
Inactive / Retired
– New Standards / Technology Now Available and Implemented
– Require Waiver and Migration Plan
– Remain in the Registry
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
IT Standards Governance Organization
Membership
Technical Working Groups
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD GIG Technical Guidance (GTG)
Walt Okon
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD Technical Guidance Concept
Structured and
Unstructured Sources
for Standards and
Specifications
(Notional)
DISR
NCID
Capability
Development Areas
Mission Area Portfolios
Technical
Direction
Query
DARS
XML
Metadata
Registry
SFIS
Taxonomy
...
UNCLASSIFIED
Detailed
Interoperability
Standards &
Specifications
Information
XML
Schemas/
Components
Standards &
Specifications
For
Interoperability
Standards
Specifications
Joint Capability Areas
GIG
Technical Guidance
CADM
80XX
Technical
Direction
Query
Capability
DKO
4630
Query &
Retrieve
Standards
Specifications
Identified
Interoperability
Standard,
Specifications,
And Interfaces
GIG Governance Processes
Standards
Specifications
Community Of Interest
Standards
Specifications
UNCLASSIFIED
Architects Career Path
Architects Competencies
Architects Certifications
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
IMPROVING DOD’S
ARCHITECTURE
 Guidance
– DoDAF v2.0
– Federated Architecture Strategy
 Tools
– DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS)
– DoD IT Standards Registry (DISR)
– Type II – GIG Technical Direction
 Education and Training
– DoD Architecture Training Effort
All this is nothing without Certified
Architects!
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
ARCHITECTURE TRAINING
 Expanded need for architectures and their
significance in achieving defense of our nation
results in the need for qualified architects
 Therefore, we are confronted with questions:
– Is there a pool of qualified architects?
– What are the competencies of an architect?
– Is there a core body of knowledge?
– What education and training courses exist?
 DoD– IT Architects Career Path–Architects Series
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD
 Deliver an architect career plan
 Establish architecture specialties in Office
of Personnel Management (OPM)
 Formalize a competency framework
 Implement Certificates & Certification
across architecture specialties
 Work with academic and educational
institutions to enhance their curricula
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
 WHITE PAPER - Phase I: A Competency
Framework
– Defines a path for a quality architecture
workforce
– Provides collected data on the competencies
of an architect
– https://www.us.army.mil/suite/doc/10757012
 Architecture Education and Training DKO Site
 OPM Job Family Standard Review
 Clinger-Cohen Core Competency Review for
Architecture
 Delivered two Architecture Training Tutorials at
2008 EA Conference
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD Information
Sharing Environment
Walt Okon
Chief Architect, DoD Information Sharing
Architecture & Interoperability Directorate
Office of the DoD CIO/ASD NII
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Complexities of Information Sharing
Terrorist
Actions
Humanitarian
Operations
Counter
Terrorism
Warfighter
Operations
Natural
Disasters
Northeast Power
Blackout
Failed States
(Haiti)
Pandemic
Flu
Coalition
Operations
DoD is part of this complex, extended information sharing enterprise…
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD Information Sharing
Description:
Environment
– Provide a DoD Information Sharing architecture
and standards capability which will support
cross-community, institutional approach to the
sharing of information within DoD and can
apply across Federal Departments, state, and
local governments
– Provide architecture and engineering guidance
for DoD Information Sharing Executive and DoD
Information Sharing
– Provide PM-ISE DoD’s Shared Space
architecture and standard guidance to enable
cross-community sharing for identifying,
planning, installing, and operating capabilities
that will become the ISE.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD Information Sharing
Environment
 FY08 Key Taskings:
– PM-ISE Chief Architect Roundtable and the
CTISS Committee
– Design and deliver a CTISS Federated Standards
Registry pilot
– Develop a DoD ISE Shared Space use case and
concept capabilities with Net-Centric direction
– Partner with other ISE architects in the Federal
Departments
– Partnership with DISA on analysis and
engineering.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Bring It All Together
DoD Enterprise Architecture Conference 2009
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD Enterprise Architecture
Conference 2009
 DoD Enterprise Architecture Conference
– All DoD Architecture Professionals
– Only official Architecture Conference
– Enterprise Architecture & Standards
– Deliver Interoperability
 1 – 5 June 2009; DoD Enterprise Architecture
Conference 2009 in St Louis, MO
– Deliverables
http://www.afei.org/brochure/9a05/index.cfm
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Questions/Wrap-Up
Walt Okon
Chief Architect, DoD Information Sharing
Enterprise Architecture & Standards Directorate
Office of the DoD CIO/ASD NII
07 December 2008
[email protected]
703-607-0502
UNCLASSIFIED