The Geologic Record Sean D. Pitman, M.D. May 2007 www.DetectingDesign.com Features of the Geologic Column • Made of layers of sedimentary rock • Layers generally.
Download ReportTranscript The Geologic Record Sean D. Pitman, M.D. May 2007 www.DetectingDesign.com Features of the Geologic Column • Made of layers of sedimentary rock • Layers generally.
The Geologic Record Sean D. Pitman, M.D. May 2007 www.DetectingDesign.com Features of the Geologic Column • Made of layers of sedimentary rock • Layers generally very flat/even relative to each other • Found generally all over the globe – Some areas have few or missing layers – Some areas have most if not all the layers • Found on mountains such as the Swiss Alps, Mt. Everest, American Rockies, Himalayas, Appalachians, etc . . . • Popularly thought to record millions and even billions of years of Earth’s history An Old Geologic Column? Foot of the Book Cliffs northwest of Grand Junction, CO • Layers are flat/even relative to each other • Layers often extend over hundreds of thousands of square miles • Where is the expected unevenness usually seen with weathering? Prof. Walter Veith – Turbidite Discussion Walter Veith – Flames and Load Casts The Speed of Erosion • • • • Rockies currently uplifted at 100-1000 cm/Kyr No change in elevation Erosion rate is matching uplift rate Current uplift thought to have started 70 million years ago (Laramide Orogeny) • An erosion rate of 100 cm/Kyr equals 1,000 meters of erosion per million years or an incredible 70,000 meters in 70 million years • Total thickness of layers in this region is ~3,500 meters – Why are they still there? Mt. Everest • Thought to be about 50 million years old • Himalayan erosion rate ~200cm/kyr • Just 100 cm/Kyr of erosion equals ~50,000 vertical meters of erosion in 50 My • Still covered by Ordovician limestone - only about halfway down the column! • Perhaps the layers used to be much thicker? – Only some 6000 m of sediment once covered Everest – Harutaka Sakai suggest half of Everest slid off 20 Ma – 3000m (Ordovician) exposed for 20 Ma and its still there? Really? • • • • Today’s continents average 0.875 km above sea level Land surface area: 148,647,000 sq km Cubic km above sea level: 130,066,125 km3 An average of several references suggest that about 13.6 km3 of solid material are carried by all the rivers of the Earth into the oceans every year – 31,000 million metric tons/year • Time needed to erode away all land currently above sea level: ~9.5 million years http://worldatlas.com/geoquiz/thelist.htm • Dott and Batten (1971) noted: "North America is being denuded at a rate that could level it in a mere 10 million years, or, to put it another way, at the same rate, ten North Americas could have been eroded since middle Cretaceous time 100 m.y. ago." C. R. Twidale recognized this problem as far back as a 1976 in the American Journal of Science: “Even if it is accepted that estimates of the contemporary rate of degradation of land surfaces are several orders too high to provide an accurate yardstick of erosion in the geological past there has surely been ample time for the very ancient features preserved in the present landscape to have been eradicated several times over. . . The survival of these paleoforms is in some degree an embarrassment to all of the commonly accepted models of landscape development.” B.W. Sparks (1986) in Geomorphology: "Some of these rates [of erosion] are obviously staggering; the Yellow River could peneplain [flatten out] an area with the average height that of Everest in 10 million years. The student has two courses open to him: to accept long extrapolations of short-term denudation [erosion] figures and doubt the reality of the erosion surfaces, or to accept the erosion surfaces and be skeptical about the validity of long extrapolations of present erosion rates." What About Human Impact? “Humans have simultaneously increased the sediment transport by global rivers through soil erosion (by 0.6 - 2.3 billion metric tons per year), yet reduced the flux of sediment reaching the world’s coasts (by 0.3 - 1.4 billion metric tons per year) because of retention within reservoirs.” James P. M. Syvitski, Charles J. Vo¨ro¨smarty, Albert J. Kettner, Pamela Green Impact of Humans on the Flux of Terrestrial Sediment to the Global Coastal Ocean, Science, VOL 308, 15 APRIL 2005 The Smooth Grand Canyon Dome Mini-Grand Staircase? How did Red Butte Survive 5.5 million years? Red Butte, Arizona Beartooth Butte • 300-400 million yeas old • Same layers: Paleozoic Beartooth Butte, Wyoming Goosenecks of San Juan River 9 miles northwest of Mexican Hat, UT Sinkholes in Permian Kaibab Along right bank of Chevelon Fork (of the Little Colorado River) 18 miles southeast of Winslow, AZ Trinidad Beach, CA Dead Sea Sinkholes Diversion of the Jordan River causing shrinkage of Dead Sea by 3 feet per year 25 miles northwest of Twin Falls, ID Dry Falls Dry Falls W S N E The Real Grand Canyon Straight shot with few twists or U-shaped turns Grander Canyon Cataract? Grander Canyon Cataract? Younger With Time? • The lava dams were once believed to have eroded over tens to hundreds of thousands of years each The Baby Grand? • • • • Ed Stiles, "Is the Grand Canyon a Geologic Infant?" The University of Arizona News, OPI, July 18, 2002 2000 foot GC lava dams collapsed within 80 minutes! Huge wall of water suddenly released “37 times the flow of the largest flooding of the Mississippi River” • Huge amounts of rapidly moving water equal huge amounts of rapid erosion • Certain portions of the Grand Canyon, once thought to be up to 5 million years old (Marble Canyon and the Inner Gorge), “may be as young as 600,000 years old” • Initial dating of 5 My backed up by K/Ar dating, now thought to be inaccurate in this region due to the lack of complete removal of the argon daughter product at the time of initial formation of the lava dams • Mather Gorge and Holtwood Gorge in Pennsylvania • Used to be 180 million years old • July, 2004: Luke J. Reusser, a geologist at the University of Vermont in Burlington, used measurements of beryllium-10 that builds up in quartz when exposed to cosmic rays to redate these gorges to just 13,000 years • Younger now by 4 orders of magnitude! Monument Valley Over 50 million years of erosion? Trinidad Beach, CA Walter Veith – Miniature Monument Valley Walter Veith – “Town Hall” Trinidad Beach, CA Arches National Park 100 million years of erosion in southeastern Utah? • More than 2,000 arches within 73,000 acres of southeastern Utah • Once buried by almost 1 mile of sediment • Local uplift caused cracks to form 100 million years ago • Subsequent erosion expanded the cracks to form the fins and arches that we see today Arches National Park, UT Landscape Arch • Erosion rates too high for the layers to still be there, much less thin walled high-relief fins to survive for tens of millions of years • Note also that only the surface layers of these fins show any evidence of significant erosion Paraconformities Redwall N.D. Newell, in the 1984 issue of the Princeton University Press, made a very interesting and revealing comment concerning this paraconformity phenomenon: "A puzzling characteristic of the erathem boundaries and of many other major biostratigraphic boundaries [boundaries between different types of fossil groups] is the general lack of physical evidence of subaerial exposure. Traces of deep leaching, scour, channeling, and residual gravels tend to be lacking, even where the underlying rocks are cherty [soft] limestones. These boundaries are paraconformities that are usually identifiable only by paleontological [fossil] evidence." • In an earlier paper Newell noted: "A remarkable aspect of paraconformities in limestone sequences is general lack of evidence of leaching of the undersurface. Residual sods and karst surfaces [irregular erosion channels] that might be expected to result from long subaerial exposure are lacking or unrecognized. . . The origin of paraconformities is uncertain, and I certainly do not have a simple solution to this problem." Angular Unconformity Happened slowly? – or catastrophically? Clastic Dikes Varves • Lambert and Hsü (1979) measured "varves" in Lake Walensee, Switzerland and found up to five laminae deposited during one year • From 1811, which was a clear marker point (because a newly built canal discharged into the lake), until 1971, a period of 160 years, they found the number of laminae ranged between 300 and 360 instead of the expected one per year or 160 – Our investigations supported de Geer's first contention that sediment-laden floodwaters could generate turbidity underflows to deposit varves, but threw doubt on his second interpretation that varves or varve-like sediment are necessarily annual. (Lambert and Hsü, p. 454) Continental Drift • 2000 years ago Emphesis was a seaport city, now it is 5 miles inland • Louisiana coastline is being lost a 25sq. miles per year • US spends $500,000,000 to prevent erosion of the east and west coasts • Florida spends $8,000,000 per year • Past 50 years Washington state has lost over 300 meters of certain of its coastlines • Northern and north center regions of California erode at about 30 cm/yr with some areas (Capitola) eroding at up to 1.5 m/yr (Plant and Griggs 1991). http://bonita.mbnms.nos.noaa.gov/sitechar/main.html Trinidad, Northern California • Texas is loosing between 0.3 and 15 meters of coastline per year • Major Gulf-coast storms can cause 30-40 meters of erosion in 1 day • Landmark lighthouse of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, built 1500 m inland in 1869 had to be moved another ~1000 m to avoid collapse into the ocean – About 10 meters of erosion/year • True all over the world • Japan literally spends billions of dollars to prevent erosion “Significant Losses From Coastal Erosion Anticipated Along U.S. Coastlines,” Federal Emergency Management Agency - June, 2000 http://www.fema.gov/nwz00/erosion.shtm • What would an average of just 1 cm of coastal erosion/deposition do to the shape of the continents in 200 million years? • No big deal – right? • The change would be two thousand kilometers (1,200 miles) . . . Enough to erode (or deposit) half way through or onto the United States on all sides! • Would the puzzle still fit? • Why are all deltas young? • Gulf of Mexico filled in 10 Ma Questions? www.DetectingDesign.com