Beyond Classroom Management: School-based Mental Health & Positive Behavior Support George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education and Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports University of.
Download ReportTranscript Beyond Classroom Management: School-based Mental Health & Positive Behavior Support George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education and Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports University of.
Beyond Classroom Management: School-based Mental Health & Positive Behavior Support George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education and Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports University of Connecticut www.pbis.org [email protected] March 30, 2007 Rose, L. C., & Gallup. A. M. (2005). 37th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Kappan, September, 41-59. TOP FOUR 2005 • Lack of financial support (since 2000) • Overcrowded schools • Lack of discipline & control • Drug use #1 SPOT • >2000 lack of financial support • 1991-2000 drug use • <1991 lack of discipline Do you want to…. • Improve general classroom & school climate & community relations • Decrease dependence on reactive disciplinary practices • Maximize impact of instruction to affect academic achievement • Improve behavioral supports for students with emotional & behavioral challenges • Improve efficiency of behavior related initiatives Purpose: 7 Lessons Learned Review classroom management practices from a school-wide perspective….. 1. • • Context Matters! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or schools that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable Learning & teaching environments must be redesigned to increase the likelihood of behavioral & academic success Examples Individual Student vs. School-wide “Reiko” Assessments indicate that Reiko performs in average to above average range in most academic areas. However, her teacher has noticed Reiko’s frequent talking & asking & answering questions without raising her hand has become an annoying problem to other students & to teacher. What would you do? “Kiyoshi” Kiyoshi is a highly competent student, but has long history of antisocial behavior. He is quick to anger, & minor events quickly escalate to major confrontations. He has few friends, & most of his conflicts occur with peers in hallways & cafeteria & on bus. In last 2 months, he has been given 8 days of in school detention & 6 days of out of school suspension. In a recent event, he broke glasses of another student. What would you do? “Mitch” Mitch displays a number of stereotypic (e.g., light filtering with his fingers, head rolling) & self-injurious behaviors (e.g., face slapping, arm biting), & his communications are limited to a verbal vocabulary of about 25 words. When his usual routines are changed or items are not in their usual places, his rates of stereotypic & self-injurious behavior increase quickly. What would you do? “Rachel” Rachel dresses in black every day, rarely interacts with teachers or other students, & writes & distributes poems & stories about witchcraft, alien nations, gundams, & other science fiction topics. When approached or confronted by teachers, she pulls hood of her black sweatshirt or coat over her head & walks away. Mystified by Rachel’s behavior, teachers usually shake their heads & let her walk away. Recently, Rachel carefully wrapped a dead squirrel in black cloth & placed it on her desk. Other students became frightened when she began talking to it. What would you do? Fortunately, we have a science that guides us to… • Assess these situations • Develop behavior intervention plans based on our assessment • Monitor student progress & make enhancements All in ways that can be culturally & contextually appropriate Crone & Horner, 2003 However, context matters…. What factors influence our ability to implement what we know with accuracy, consistency, & durability for students like Rachel, Reiko, Mitch, & Kiyoshi? “141 Days!” Intermediate/senior high school with 880 students reported over 5,100 office discipline referrals in one academic year. Nearly 2/3 of students have received at least one office discipline referral. 5,100 referrals = 76,500 min @15 min = 1,275 hrs = 159 days @ 8 hrs “Da place ta be” During 4th period, in-school detention room has so many students that the overflow is sent to the counselor’s office. Most students have been assigned for being in the hallways after the late bell. “Cliques” During Advisory Class, the “sportsters” sit in the back of the room, & “goths” sit at the front. Most class activities result in out of seat, yelling arguments between the two groups. “Four corners” Three rival gangs are competing for “four corners.” Teachers actively avoid the area. Because of daily conflicts, vice principal has moved her desk to four corners. “FTD” On 1st day of school, a teacher found “floral” arrangement on his desk. “Welcome to the neighborhood” was written on the card Questions! • What would behavior support look like if Mitch, Rachel, Kiyoshi, & Reiko were in these classrooms & schools? • Are these environments safe, caring, & effective? Context Matters! Big worry is “Get Tough” approach to responding to problem behavior Example: “Teaching” by Getting Tough Runyon: “I hate this f____ing school, & you’re a dumbf_____.” Teacher: “That is disrespectful language. I’m sending you to the office so you’ll learn never to say those words again….starting now!” Immediate & seductive solution….”Get Tough!” • Clamp down & increase monitoring • Re-re-re-review rules • Extend continuum & consistency of consequences • Establish “bottom line” ...Predictable individual response Reactive responses are predictable…. When we experience aversive situation, we select interventions that produce immediate relief – Remove student – Remove ourselves – Modify physical environment – Assign responsibility for change to student &/or others When behavior doesn’t improve, we “Get Tougher!” • Zero tolerance policies • Increased surveillance • Increased suspension & expulsion • In-service training by expert • Alternative programming …..Predictable systems response! Erroneous assumption that student… • Is inherently “bad” • Will learn more appropriate behavior through increased use of “aversives” • Will be better tomorrow……. But….false sense of safety/security! • Fosters environments of control • Triggers & reinforces antisocial behavior • Shifts accountability away from school • Devalues child-adult relationship • Weakens relationship between academic & social behavior programming Science of behavior has taught us that students…. • Are NOT born with “bad behaviors” • Do NOT learn when presented contingent aversive consequences ……..Do learn better ways of 2. behaving by being taught directly & receiving positive feedback. Lessons Learned: White House Conference on School Safety • Students, staff, & community must have means of communicating that is immediate, safe, & reliable • Positive, respectful, predictable, & trusting studentteacher-family relationships are important • High rates of academic & social success are important • Positive, respectful, predictable, & trusting school environment/climate is important for all students • Metal detectors, surveillance cameras, & security guards are insufficient deterrents Lessons Learned: White House Conference on School Safety Early Correlates/Indicators • Significant change in academic &/or social behavior patterns • Frequent, unresolved victimization • Extremely low rates of academic &/or social success • Negative/threatening written &/or verbal messages Good teaching is one of our best behavior management tools STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Good Teaching Behavior Management Increasing District & State Competency and Capacity Investing in Outcomes, Data, Practices, and Systems APPLY CONTINUUM OF INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior What is RtI? EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING STUDENT PERFORMANCE CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING RtI: Good “IDEA” Policy • Approach to increase efficiency, accountability, & impact • NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention • NOT limited to special education • NOT new – – – – – Problem solving process Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching Curriculum based assessment Precision teaching Applied behavior analysis • Demonstrations – Systemic early literacy – School-wide positive behavior support RtI Applications EARLY READING/LITERACY SOCIAL BEHAVIOR TEAM General educator, special educator, reading specialist, Title 1, school psychologist, etc. General educator, special educator, behavior specialist, Title 1, school psychologist, etc. UNIVERSAL SCREENING Curriculum based measurement SSBD, record review, gating PROGRESS MONITORING Curriculum based measurement ODR, suspensions, behavior incidents, precision teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS 5-specific reading skills: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension Direct social skills instruction, positive reinforcement, token economy, active supervision, behavioral contracting, group contingency management, function-based support, selfmanagement DECISION MAKING RULES Core, strategic, intensive Primary, secondary, tertiary tiers Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity 1-5% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive 5-10% 80-90% 1-5% Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive Implications & Cautions (E.g., Gresham, Grimes, Kratochwill, Tilly, etc.) • Psychometric features of measures for student outcomes & universal screening? • Standardized measurement procedures? • Valid & documented “cut” criteria for determining responsiveness? • • • • Interventions efficacy, effectiveness, & relevance? Students with disabilities? Professional development? Applications across grades/schools & curriculum areas? • Treatment integrity & accountability? • Functioning of general v. special education? 5. Classroom Setting Systems School-wide Systems Link Classroom to School-wide Positive Behavior Support Systems School-wide Systems 1. Common purpose & approach to discipline 2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors 3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior 4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior 6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation Classroom Setting Systems • Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged • Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged • Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adultstudent interaction • Active supervision • Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors • Frequent precorrections for chronic errors • Effective academic instruction & curriculum Nonclassroom Setting Systems • Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged • Active supervision by all staff –Scan, move, interact • Precorrections & reminders • Positive reinforcement Individual Student Systems • Behavioral competence at school & district levels • Function-based behavior support planning • Team- & data-based decision making • Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes • Targeted social skills & self-management instruction • Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations Teach Social Behaviors Like Academic Skills ADJUST for Efficiency MONITOR & ACKNOWLEDGE Continuously DEFINE Simply MODEL PRACTICE In Setting Redesign Learning & Teaching Environment Few positive SW expectations defined, taught, & encouraged Reviewing Strive for Five • Be respectful. • Be safe. • Work peacefully. • Strive for excellence. • Follow directions. McCormick Elem. MD 2003 SETTING TEACHING MATRIX Expectations All Settings Hallways Playgrounds Cafeteria Library/ Computer Lab Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Study, read, compute. Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriate ly. Assembly Bus Respect Ourselves Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepared. Walk. Have a plan. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/fe et to self. Help/shar e with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whisper. Return books. Listen/watc h. Use appropriate applause. Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefully. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriate ly. Respect Property SETTING TEACHING MATRIX Expectations All Hallways Settings Playgroun ds Cafeteri a Library/ Comput er Lab Assembly Bus Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Study, read, compute. Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriate ly. Respect Ourselve s Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepared. Walk. Have a plan. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/fe et to self. Help/shar e with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whisper. Return books. Listen/watc h. Use appropriate applause. Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefully. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriate ly. Respect Property RAH – at Adams City High School (Respect – Achievement – Honor) RAH Classroom Hallway/ Cafeteria Bathrooms Commons Respect Be on time; attend Keep location neat, Put trash in cans, keep to the right, use push in your chair, regularly; follow appropriate lang., class rules be courteous to all monitor noise level, staff and students allow others to pass Keep area clean, put trash in cans, be mindful of others’ personal space, flush toilet Achievement Do your best on all assignments and assessments, take notes, ask questions Keep track of your belongings, monitor time to get to class Check space before you leave, keep track of personal belongings Be a good example to other students, leave the room better than you found it Honor Do your own work; tell the truth Be considerate of yours and others’ personal space Keep your own place in line, maintain personal boundaries Report any graffiti or vandalism RAH – Athletics RAH Practice Competitions Eligibility Lettering Team Travel Respect Listen to coaches directions; push yourself and encourage teammates to excel. Show positive sportsmanship; Solve problems in mature manner; Positive interactions with refs, umps, etc. Show up on time for every practice and competition. Show up on time for every practice and competition; Compete x%. Take care of your own possessions and litter; be where you are directed to be. Achievement Set example in the classroom and in the playing field as a true achiever. Set and reach for both individual and team goals; encourage your teammates. Earn passing grades; Attend school regularly; only excused absences Demonstrate academic excellence. Complete your assignments missed for team travel. Honor Demonstrate good sportsmanship and team spirit. Suit up in clean uniforms; Win with honor and integrity; Represent your school with good conduct. Show team pride in and out of the school. Stay out of trouble – set a good example for others. Suit up for any competitions you are not playing. Show team honor. Remember you are acting on behalf of the school at all times and demonstrate team honor/pride. Cheer for teammates. P R I D E Perseverance Holding to a course of action despite obstacles Respect To show consideration, appreciation, and acceptance Integrity Adherence to an agreed upon code of behavior Discipline Managing ones self to achieve goals and meet expectations Excellence Being of finest or highest quality • Strive for consistency • Attend class daily; be on time • Meet deadlines; do your homework • Do your personal best • Exceed minimum expectations • Inspire excellence in others • Stay positive • Set goals • Learn from mistakes • Respect yourself • Respect others • Demonstrate appropriate language and behavior • Be responsible • Do your own work • Be trustworthy and trust others NEHS website, Oct. 26, 2004 Character Education • Easy to change moral knowledge.....difficult to change moral conduct • To change moral conduct... – Adults must model moral behavior – Students must experience academic success – Students must be taught social skills for success Acknowledge & Recognize Cougar Traits in the Community Student Name __________________________________ Displayed the Cougar Trait of: Respect Responsibility Caring Citizenship (Circle the trait you observed) Signature _____________________________________________ If you would like to write on the back the details of what you observed feel free! Thank you for supporting our youth. Are “Rewards” Dangerous? “…our research team has conducted a series of reviews and analysis of (the reward) literature; our conclusion is that there is no inherent negative property of reward. Our analyses indicate that the argument against the use of rewards is an overgeneralization based on a narrow set of circumstances.” – Cameron, 2002 • Cameron & Pierce, 1994, 2002 • Cameron, Banko & Pierce, 2001 Clever Variations • Bus Bucks • Super Sub Slips What really matters • Golden Plunger is positive social acknowledgement • G.O.O.S.E. & interaction!! • First-in-Line • Patriot’s Parking Pass • Business Partner Discount 7. Invest in establishing adequate staff support Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior T otal O ffic e D is c ipl ine R efer r al Kennedy Middle School 1500 1200 900 600 300 0 95-96 96-97 97-98 School Years 98-99 FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals Sustained Impact 3000 Pre Total ODRs 2500 2000 Post 1500 1000 500 0 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 Academic Years ODR Admin. Benefit Springfield MS, MD 2001-2002 2002-2003 2277 1322 = 955 42% improvement = 14,325 min. @15 min. = 238.75 hrs = 40 days Admin. time ODR Instruc. Benefit Springfield MS, MD 2001-2002 2002-2003 2277 1322 = 955 42% improvement = 42,975 min. @ 45 min. = 716.25 hrs = 119 days Instruc. time 4J School District Change from 97-98 to 01-02 Elem With School-wide PBS 20 Eugene, Oregon 15 10 5 0 -5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Schools Change from 97-98 to 01-02 Elem Without School-wide PBS 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 1 2 3 4 Schools 5 6 Change in the percentage of students meeting the state standard in reading at grade 3 from 97-98 to 0102 for schools using PBIS all four years and those that did not. Mean ODRs per 100 students per school day Illinois and Hawaii Elementary Schools 2003-04 (No Minors) Schools using SW-PBS report a 25% lower rate of ODRs Mean ODR/100/Day 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 .85 .64 0.2 0 N = 87 N = 53 Met SET 80/80 Did Not Meet SET Illinois 02-03 Mean Proportion of Students Meeting ISAT Reading Mean Percentage of 3rd graders meeting ISAT Reading Standard Standard t test (df 119) p < .0001 70% 62.19% 60% 50% 46.60% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% PBIS NOT in place N = 69 PBIS IN place N = 52 Proportion of Students Meeting Reading Standards Proportion of 3rd Graders who meet or exceed state reading standards (ISAT) in Illinois schools 02-03 t = 9.20; df = 27 p < .0001 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 N =23 N = 23 NN==88 0 Not Meeting SET Meeting SET Central Illinois Elem, Middle Schools Triangle Summary 03-04 1 05% Mean Proportion of Students 11% 20% 0.8 22% 0.6 84% 58% 0.4 0.2 0 Met SET (N = 23) Not Met SET (N =12) 6+ ODR 2-5 ODR 0-1 ODR Major Office Discipline Referrals (05-06) Mean Proportion of Students0-1 '2-5 '6+ 100% 90% 3% 8% 10% 11% 16% 18% 89% 74% 71% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% K=6 (N = 1010) 6-9 (N = 312) 9-12 (N = 104) Major Office Discipline Referrals (05-06) Percentage of ODRs by Student Group '0-1 '2-5 '6+ 100% 90% 32% 48% 45% 43% 37% 40% 25% 15% 15% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% K-6 (N = 1010) 6-9 (N = 312) 9-12 (N = 104) http://rtckids.fmhi.usf.edu Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., & Lynn, N. (2006). School-based mental health: An empirical guide for decision makers. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. Louis De la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child & Family Studies, Research & Training Center for Children’s Mental Health. References • • • • • • • • • Colvin, G., & Lazar, M. (1997). The effective elementary classroom: Managing for success. Longmont, CO: Sopris West. Colvin, G., Sugai, G., & Patching, W. (1993). Pre-correction: An instructional strategy for managing predictable behavior problems. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 143-150. Darch, C. B., & Kameenui, E. J. (2003). Instructional classroom management: A proactive approach to behavior management. (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman. Jones, V. F. & Jones, L. S. (2001). Comprehensive classroom management: Creating communities of support and solving problems (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Kameenui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (2002). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Latham, G. I. (1997). Behind the schoolhouse door: Eight skills every teacher should have. Utah State University. Latham, G. (1992). Interacting with at-risk children: The positive position. Principal, 72(1), 26-30. Martella, R. C., Nelson, J. R., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (2003). Managing disruptive behaviors in the schools: A schoolwide, classroom, and individualized social learning approach. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Paine, S. C., Radicchi, J., Rosellini, L. C., Deutchman, L., & Darch, C. B. (1983). Structuring your classroom for academic success. Champaign, IL: Research Press. SETTING Hallwa ys Playgroun ds Cafeter ia Librar y/ Comp uter Lab Assembl y Bus Respect Ourselv es Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepar ed. Walk. Have a plan. Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Study, read, comp ute. Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/ feet to self. Help/s hare with others. Use normal voice volume . Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment . Practic e good table manner s Whisp er. Retur n books. Listen/wa tch. Use appropria te applause . Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Respect Property Recycl e. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintai n physica l space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replac e trays & utensils . Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefu lly. Pick up. Treat chairs appropria tely. Wipe your feet. Sit appropri ately. All Setting s CONTACT INFO [email protected] [email protected] www.pbis.org