Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Financial Resources and Governmental Relations CTE and Skill Center Program Funding, Accounting & Data Reporting October 2014
Download ReportTranscript Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Financial Resources and Governmental Relations CTE and Skill Center Program Funding, Accounting & Data Reporting October 2014
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Financial Resources and Governmental Relations CTE and Skill Center Program Funding, Accounting & Data Reporting October 2014 Current Funding Formula Issues • The 1995 Secondary Vocational Education in the State of Washington report cited a CTE enhancement of 28%. • Current CTE enhancement is $746 per FTE or 14%. Indirect percent is set at 15%. • 89% of the enhancement is generated by MSOC, while 11% is generated by staffing allocations. • General education MSOC has increased by 43% since the 2011-12 SY, while CTE MSOC has increased by only 4.88%. • CTE Teacher staffing ratio is 1:26.57, while the Prototypical High School Teacher staffing ratio is 1:28.74. The 1995 report referenced a funded class size in 1992-93 of 1:16.67. • Statewide CTE CIS staff unit enhancement is 61.72 or approximately 1 per 1,000 CTE student FTE. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 2 Revising Funding Formulas • • • • • • Other CIS staffing ratio. Principal allocation. CTE director allocation. Revise MSOC allocation. Implement lower class sizes (McCleary Decision). Fund a mechanism for the startup of new CTE or Skill Center programs. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 3 Other CIS Staff Allocation Deficit • CTE and Skill Center programs receive less of an other CIS Staff allocation per student FTE than a general education student. Other CIS Staff Ratio for Basic Education for 2013–14 School Year Other CIS Staffing Position Librarian Counselor Nurse Social Worker Psychologist Total Allocation per 600 Student FTE Prototypical HS Allocation Per 600 Student FTE CTE Programs Skill Center Programs 0.523 2.009 0.096 0.015 0.007 2.650 0.199 0.968 0.037 0.006 0.003 1.213 0.233 1.131 0.043 0.007 0.003 1.416 Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 4 Other CIS Staffing Allocation • Accounting guidance does not allow charges for nurses, social workers, and psychologists in the CTE program. • Enhancements to other CIS staff units not needed within the CTE programs. Recommendation • These staff units should be moved out of the CTE programs to be allocated in the prototypical middle or high school. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 5 Principal / CTE Director Allocation • Activity 23 – Principal is not an allowable expense in the CTE programs. • The principal allocation is backed out of the general education allocation. Recommendation • CTE students should generate a principal allocation at the prototypical middle or high school, and not within the CTE program. • An allocation should be provided for a CTE Director (separate from a principal) at a rate of 1 per 432 middle school CTE FTE, and 1 per 600 high school CTE FTE. • Expenses associated with the CTE Director should be charged to Activity 21 – Supervision. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 6 Reduction of MSOC Enhancements • Recent state budgets have reduced the CTE and Skill Center MSOC allocations. $1,600.00 $1,400.00 $1,200.00 Enhancement $662.28 Enhancement $219.09 Enhancement $569.44 $1,000.00 $800.00 Enhancement $799.69 BEA MSOC CTE MSOC $600.00 $400.00 $200.00 $- 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction 2015-16 Slide 7 MSOC – Districtwide Support • Costs associated with Utilities, Facilities Maintenance, and Districtwide Support should be charged to Program 97 – Districtwide Support. • These costs should be considered part of the current 15% indirect rate charged to the CTE program. Recommendation • CTE students should generate these allocations at the same rate as general education students in the general education program. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 8 MSOC – CTE Program Allocation Recommendation • Allocations for Technology, Curriculum, Library and Other Supplies, and Professional Development should remain in the CTE program. • The allocations for these areas of MSOC would be increased to reflect how much more CTE programs actually spend in these areas as compared to general education. • Expenses in these areas should be direct charged to the appropriate CTE program. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 9 CTE MSOC Allocation 2013-14 School Year MSOC Category General Ed. Allocation (2013-14 School Year) CTE Multiplier CTE Allocation Technology $77.46 3.19 $247.10 Curriculum $83.17 2.86 $237.87 Library and Other Supplies $176.56 1.54 $271.90 Professional Development $12.86 1.05 $13.50 Total $350.05 2.20 $770.37 • Categories of MSOC allocation are defined as direct program charges in the accounting manual. • CTE multiplier based on actual expenditure data from the 2012-13 school year. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 10 Per Student CTE MSOC 2015-16 General Education CTE Program Total Per Student $0 $409.71 $409.71 $348.98 $0 $348.98 Curriculum $0 $394.38 $394.38 Library/Other Supplies $0 $450.84 $450.84 Professional Development $0 $22.39 $22.39 Facilities Maintenance $172.88 $0 $172.88 Districtwide Support $119.77 $0 $119.77 Totals $641.64 $1,277.33 $1,918.97 Category Technology Utilities/Insurance Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 11 Skill Center MSOC 2015-16 School Year • Skill Center MSOC should be funded based on a three-year average ratio of per pupil expenditures as compared to general education. 2015-16 (SY) MSOC Rate General Ed Multiplier $1,222.05 Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction 2.49 Skill Center $3,042.90 Slide 12 Implement Lower Class Sizes • In the context of the McCleary Decision, CTE programs are underfunded. Recommendation • Lower the CTE class size to 19.0. • Lower the Skill Center class size to 16.0. • Can be phased in over three school years with target values achieved in the 2017-18 school year. School Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 CTE Class Size 24.05 21.52 19.0 Skill Center Class Size 20.51 18.25 16.0 Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 13 Fiscal Impact for 2015-16 School Year Proposal Element Cost Impact 2015-16 (In Millions) Other CIS Staff moved to general education $11.5 Principals moved to general education -$0.4 CTE Director $8.2 MSOC revisions $38.0 Class Size allocation for CTE of 24.05 $21.5 Class Size allocation for Skill Centers of 20.51 Grand Total of Recommendations Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction $2.0 $80.8 Slide 14 Expenditure Accounting System • Created additional accounting codes that more closely align with costs funded in the MSOC categories. Implemented Activity 33 – Curriculum for 2014-15 school year. • Create transparency in regards to what is being charged to CTE; and provide a balance by reducing the indirect rate from 15% to the federal restricted rate (on average less than 4%). • The indirect rate would only be reduced if the proposed revisions to CTE MSOC were implemented as presented. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 15 Data Reporting and Transparency • Implementation of Activity 33 as mentioned above. • Isolate the general education portion of CTE funding on the 1191 CTE reports from the value of the CTE enhancement. Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 16 QUESTIONS? Financial Resources and Governmental Relations Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Slide 17