Transcript Slide 1
Chapter 1 Congruent Triangles DEFINITION. Two triangles ABC and DEF are said to be congruent if the following six conditions all hold : 1.A D 4. AB DE 2.B E 5.BC EF 3.C F 6. AC DF In this case, we write ABC DEF and we say that the various congruent angles and segments "correspond" to each other. SAS THEOREM (POSTULATE) If A D, AB DE and then ABC DEF . AC DF , If A D, B E and AB DE , then ABC DEF. Proof of ASA Assume that in ABC and DEF A D, B E and AB DE. Consider now AC and DF. If we knew that they were congruent, then we would be done: The two triangles would be congruent by SAS. So we assume that they are not equal and AC is longer. Since AC is longer there is an interior point G on AC such that AG DF . But now ABG and DEF satisfy: A D, AB DE and AG DF So, by SAS, ABG DEF . Hence , ABG E But , by hypothesis ABC E Comparing these two equations, we see that ABG ABC But this is impossible: ABG has to be smaller than ABC because G is an interior point of ABC . This is a contradiction. Hence, our assumption that AC must is not congruent to DF False. be Therefore, ABC DEF and the proof is concluded. Isosceles Triangle Theorem Let ABC be any triangle 1. B C then AB AC 2. If If AB AC then B C Proof. (1): In this case we have these three Congruences , B C , C B and BC CB Hence, ABC ACB by ASA (!). So AB AC as corresponding part of congruent triangles. Proof. (2): Now use the congruences, AB AC , AC AB , And A A . To conclude that ABC ACB by SAS. So B C . SSS THEOREM If AB DE, BC EF and AC DF , then ABC DEF . Assume in ABC and DEF that AB DE, BC EF and AC. DF We now construct a point G such that GBC E and GCB F By ASA, GBC DEF . To prove the theorem we will prove that GBC ABC Construct GA . Since AB DE by assumption,and DE GB as corresponding parts of congruent triangles, we conclude that AB GB , by transitivity. Hence BAG is an isosceles triangle. So, BAG BGA . By a similar line of reasoning CAG is an isosceles triangle and CAG CGA Now consider the following relations: BAG CAG CAG CGA CGA BGA BGA BAG Together, these imply that BAG BAG This is impossible.Hence, G must coincide with A, GBC B E and ABC DEF by SAS. PROBLEM. To bisect an angle. Solution. First, use your compass to construct B and C such that AB AC . Then draw an arc with center B, and arc with center C, both with the same radius . Let D be their point of intersection. ThenAD is the angle bisector. Since AD AD, AB AC, and BD CD, We may conclude that ABD ACD by SSS. Hence, BAD CAD . PROBLEM Given angle A and ray BC , construct an angle DBC that will be congruent to A . , Proof Since AP BC, AQ BD, PQ CD, We have APQ BCD by SSS. Hence A DBC . PROBLEM Given a line and a point P not on . construct a line that passes through P and is perpendicular to . Proof Consider the two triangles PAQand PBQ . They must be congruent by SSS. From this we conclude that APQ BPQ Now, let C be the point of intersection of PQ and AB and consider PAC and PBC These two triangles have P C as a common side, they have PA PB and they have congruent angles at P, as noted previously. Hence PAC PBC. So, PCA PCB But, PCA PCB 180 . These two equations imply that PCA 90 and PCB 90 ,as claimed . Perpendicular Bisector of Segment P A B P B A A Q B Q The Vertical Angel Theorem Let the lines AB and CD meet at point P, as shown in the figure. Then APC BPD and APD BPC . B C P A D Proof Clearly, APC APD 180 and Hence, APD BPD 180 . APC 180 APD BPD 180 APD. So APC BPD .The case of APD BPC is similar. THE EXTERIOR ANGLE THEOREM In ABC extend BC to a point D on BC , forming the exterior angle ACD . Then ACD is greater than each of A and B , the remote interior angles. A F E B C D Proof The first part of the proof will consist of constructing the picture in figure . First, let E be the midpoint of AC; then connect B to E and extend to a point F in the interior of ACD such that BE EF. Now consider the triangles AEB and CEF . By construction, they have two of their respective sides congruent. Moreover, by the vertical angle theorem AEB CEF. Hence AEB CEF . This implies that ECF A . But ECF is less than ACD . So A ACD as claimed . The case of B is similar. Let ABC be a triangle in which BC is longer than AC. Then A B . or, the greater angle is opposite the greater side. A B D C . Proof We may find a point D on BC such that DC AC . Since ADC is isosceles, CAD CDA . By the exterior angle theorem CDA B, and, clearly, A CAD. Comparing these three statements, the result follows. THEOREM Let ABC be a triangle in which A B Then BC AC . or, the greater side is opposite the greater angle. A B C then If the theorem was not true, either BC AC or AC BC . ,then the triangle would be If BC AC A B. . and we would get the contradiction isosceles If AC BC ,then B A. ,which is also a contradiction. THEOREM In any triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides is greater than the length of the third side. D A B C Let ABC be any triangle. We will show that AB AC BC . Extend the side BA to a point D such that AD AC. So BD AB AC . now, since ACD is isosceles, D DCA D DCB . Therefore in BCD BC is a side opposite a larger angle DCB . The theorem now follows.