Transcript Document
Targeting Academic Research for Deposit and Disclosure http://tardis.eprints.org Enhancing future collaboration Building an opportunity for researchers to showcase their work by proactively depositing full text documents and thus enriching their collaboration environment Institutional publications repositories Discipline based repositories Repositories linked to data •Creating an Institutional Repository •Supporting ease of use for depositors •Refining software Full Text e-Print Research Archives Sharing research using Open Access Initiative compliant software: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk •Creating visibility tools for researchers Open Access Paradigm Shift Other Institutional Repositories e-Research Institutional Research Repository with RAE management Research Reporting Requirements: University, National, International •Moving towards sustainable open access institutional repository •Proactive open access culture •Integrated research discovery – enriched resources: multimedia, datasets •Target – academic research •Creation of e-Prints Soton •Initial Advocacy •Environmental audit •Software redesign for IR •Mediation offered •Project cluster collaboration •Demonstrate potential of IR as RAE tool •Import existing metadata •Collaborate with researchers to encourage proactive input •Address authentication and branding issues •Develop extra functionality •Pilot and Feedback: One record – many outputs Saving academics’ time •Policy and strategy change •Redirection to Southampton University Publications Database •Targeted Advocacy Open Access Vision EPrints Software JISC FAIR Programme Institutional Research Repository Full text only Research Policy Committees University, Faculty and Schools Pilot Schools Project based repositories Growing Repositories searchable nationally and globally Institutional Research Repository with full text where possible Back to the future with TARDis: The Open Access [R]evolution via the Southampton University Research Repository An e-Prints service informed by user needs and good information management practice http://eprints.soton.ac.uk Mark Brown Jessie Hey Natasha Lucas Pauline Simpson [email protected] Tim Brody, Lesley Carr, Jessie Hey Pete Hancock