Transcript Slide 1
National Framework for Induction & Introduction to Histopathology (England/Wales) Strand B: Direction and Standardisation of programme for School Leads Dr Elizabeth Byrne1, Mrs Sue Cossins1, Dr Anna Green2 The Leeds Teaching Hospitals1, Royal Free Hospital, London 2 RESULTS •The response rate was 57.9% (11/19) •100% of respondents felt they had a robust system in place. Fig. 1: When does departm ental induction take place for ST1 trainees? th m on W ith W ith in in th th e e f ir st e f ir st fir st d w ee k ay 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Th INTRODUCTION Histopathology school leads and trainers are required to provide induction for all new ST1 trainees. Many ST1s starting their training have limited previous exposure those who are experienced are likely to have moved to a new department. The purpose of this study is to compare current practice against the mandatory requirements set out by PMETB’s Generic Standards1 (GMC became responsible for the functions of PMETB on 1 April 2010) and the Gold Guide2, to ascertain what criteria are not being met and make recommendations for improvement in an attempt to standardise induction practice across the UK – producing a National Framework for Induction document. A trainee survey carried out by the GMC in 20093 comparing all specialties showed that Histopathology trainees in the UK rated their induction at 85.06%. A parallel survey (Strand A) was carried out to correlate these findings with the ST1 trainees’ perspective of induction delivered. Fig. 2: How long does the initial 'inform ation giving' period of your induction last? When asked to comment responses included 0% 9% 27% 1 day 27% up to 3 days 1 week more than 1 week 2 weeks 37% more than 2 weeks ‘3 day induction … then launching into clinical teams has worked well for the past 5 years’ ‘…In reality at small centres it isn't sharply demarcated.’ ‘The whole Year is an introduction to Histopathology’ DISCUSSION PMETB's Mandatory Requirements for Induction and The Percentage of Schools That Cover these at Induction Given physical orientation eg, maps and/or guided tour Information of basic terms and conditions of service, ie hours of work, instructions on reporting in sick, annual leave entitlement etc 100.0% METHODS AND TECHNOLOGY A questionnaire was created within Survey TM and sent to Training School lead Monkey trainers in England and Wales. This asked about the information they provide, what elements make up the histology introductory period and how it is delivered. The outcome will enable a direct correlation with PMETB’s1 mandatory requirements, give direction to School Leads and set minimum standards for a national framework. Told where to find key policies and protocols 100.0% Informed how they fitted into the team within dept 90.9% Given instructions on how to apply for annual/study leave 90.9% Introduced to key members of the department 100.0% Provided with health and safety information eg, fire safety, lab safety 100.0% Given training/instructions on IT and communications arrangements Informed of clinical governance, complaints handling and risk management related to their roles Given information on the organizations history, services, culture and values, including an appreciation of equality and diversity issues 100.0% QUESTIONNAIRE This was divided into the following sections: •The induction; • Was there a robust programme in place? • When was it delivered and how long did it last? • Did they give generic information eg, maps, where to find policies/SOPs etc? • Information relating to training & education • Information relating to the RCPath •Histology Introductory period • When, how and length of introductory period HISTOLOGY INTRODUCTION Following the initial information giving part of the induction: -54.5% put trainees straight into diagnostic teams -100% of trainees had intro to normal histology -54.5% have a dedicated ST1 teaching programme -45.5% have a programme with a mixture of dedicated ST1 teaching, and sessions with more senior trainees -81.8% have formal autopsy training -63.6% felt time pressures of their ordinary work load had an impact on the quality of induction given -81.8% felt that if the induction period it would negatively impact on the ability to deliver curriculum 100.0% 45.5% 54.5% Histopathology specific points to cover at induction and the percentage of schools covering these Include a clear outline of the job and its requirements 100% Information on how structured training will be provided in line with national standards 90.9% Requirement to register with RCPath 100% Requirement to complete an on-line portfolio 81.8% Stages of training to CCT 72.7% The need to be aware of minimum datasets 81.8% The timing (and approximate costs) of RCPath events such as WBAs, MSF, HY1A, ARCPs etc 100% •18.2% felt that it was not necessary to provide the information listed above. Reasons given for this: ‘Awareness of minimum dataset information will be addressed when they start reporting. There is a lot of info to cover at induction and some things can be left to a later date.’ ‘Organisational history may be interesting but is not essential’’ ‘Provide guidance for year 1, after that to year 2-5 Programme director for guidance’ Although all schools felt that they had a robust programme in place, this audit highlights that some PMETB/MMC requirements are not being covered and that induction practises/trainees experiences after the initial induction vary between schools. We recommended a national framework for induction be created, incorporating PMETB/MMC standards, to guide school leads so as to standardize the induction period and ensure all trainees receive a good quality induction. It is hoped this will also cut down time trainers need to spend preparing induction. RECOMMENDATIONS The ‘national framework’ will be implemented and act as a checklist for schools. A re-audit will take place in Autumn 2010 after implementation of the framework. LIMITATIONS The national framework only covers the generic standards and not school specific information. REFERENCES 1Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board Generic Standards for training. July 2008 and September 2009. 2Modernising Medical Careers. A Reference Guide for Postgraduate Specialist Training in the UK. The Gold Guide Third Edition June 2009. 3GMC Trainee Survey: core and specialty training UK-wide (2009)